Happiness and Feeling Connected The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness John M. Zelenski, Elizabeth K. Nisbet

Subjective connection with nature, or nature relatedness, is similar to other environmental worldview measures in predicting sustainable attitudes and behaviors, yet is unique in predicting happiness. In two studies, the authors assessed the overlap between nature relatedness and other subjective connections (e.g., with friends or country) and examined these connections as a possible confound in explaining the link between nature relatedness and happiness. Study 1 adapted a measure of general connectedness and administered it to student (n = 331) and community (n = 415) samples along with multiple nature relatedness and happiness indicators. Study 2 examined more established measures of subjective connections in another community sample (n = 204). General connectedness predicted happiness well, yet nature relatedness remained a significant distinct predictor of many happiness indicators, even after controlling for other connections. Results support the notion that nature relatedness could be a path to human happiness and environmental sustainability, though confirming this causal direction requires additional research.

Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596612. Google Scholar CrossRef
Berman M. G., Jonides J., Kaplan S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 12071212. Google Scholar Link
Bragg E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93108. Google Scholar
Brown K. W., Kasser T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349368. Google Scholar
Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 35. Google Scholar Link
Cervinka R., Röderer K., Hefler E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379388. Google Scholar Link
Cheek J. M., Smith S. M., Tropp L. R. (2002, February). Relational identity orientation: A fourth scale for the AIQ. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
Conn S. (1998). Living in the earth: Ecopsychology, health and psychotherapy. Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 179198. Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo V., Mireles-Acosta J., Tapia-Fonllem C., Fraijo-Sing B. (2011). Happiness as a correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18, 95104. Google Scholar
Diener E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national indicator. American Psychologist, 55, 3443. Google Scholar
Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J., Griffin S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 7175. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Diener E., Seligman M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 8184. Google ScholarLink
Dutcher D. D., Finley J. C., Luloff A. E., Buttolph Johnson J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474493. Google Scholar Abstract
Ersner-Hershfield H., Wimmer G., Knutson B. (2009). Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 8592. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Feral C. H. (1998). The connectedness model and optimal development: Is ecopsychology the answer to emotional well-being? Humanistic Psychologist, 26, 243274. Google Scholar
Frantz C. M., Mayer F. S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 205222. Google Scholar
Frumkin H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 234240. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Hays R. D., DiMatteo M. R. (1987). A short-form measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 6981. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Hazan C., Shaver P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511524. Google Scholar CrossRef
Howell A. J., Dopko R. L., Passmore H., Buro K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166171. Google Scholar CrossRef
Kals E., Schumacher D., Montada L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178202. Google Scholar Link
Kaplan R., Kaplan S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Kaplan S., Berman M. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 4357. Google Scholar Abstract
Kellert S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar
Kuo F. E., Sullivan W. C. (2001a). Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 543571. Google Scholar Abstract
Kuo F. E., Sullivan W. C. (2001b). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343367. Google Scholar Link
Leary M. R., Tipsord J. M., Tate E. B. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In Wayment H., Bauer J. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 137147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar CrossRef
Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137155. Google Scholar CrossRef
Malone G. P., Pillow D. R., Osman A. (2011). The General Belongingness Scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 311316. Google Scholar
Markowitz E. M., Goldberg L. R., Ashton M. C., Lee K. (2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81111. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Mayer S. F., Frantz C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503515. Google Scholar CrossRef
Mayer S. F., Frantz C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Dolliver K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607643. Google Scholar Abstract
Mitchell R., Popham F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. Lancet, 372, 16551660. Google Scholar
Nisbet E. K., Zelenski J. M. (2011a, June). Bridging sustainability and well-being with the NR-6, a brief new measure of nature relatedness. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Convention of Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Google Scholar
Nisbet E. K., Zelenski J. M. (2011b). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 11011106. Google Scholar Link
Nisbet E. K., Zelenski J. M., Murphy S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715740. Google Scholar Abstract
Nisbet E. K., Zelenski J. M., Murphy S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 303322. Google Scholar
O’Brien C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology, 49, 289295. Google Scholar
Radloff L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385401. Google Scholar Link
Ryan R. M., Frederick C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 528565. Google Scholar
Ryff C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 10691081. Google Scholar CrossRef
Saunders C. D. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10, 137149. Google Scholar
Schultz P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Schmuck P., Schultz W. P. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 6278). Norwell, MA: Kluwer. Google Scholar
Singelis T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580591. Google Scholar Link
Tropp L. R., Wright S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585600. Google Scholar Abstract
Van den Berg A. E. (2005). Health impacts of healing environments: A review of evidence for benefits of nature, daylight, fresh air, and quiet in healthcare settings. Groningen, Netherlands: Foundation 200 years University Hospital Groningen. Google Scholar
Watson D., Clark L. A., Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 10631070. Google Scholar CrossRef, Medline
Waugh C. E., Fredrickson B. L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of new relationships. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93106. Google Scholar Medline
Weinstein N., Przybylski A. K., Ryan R. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 13151329.Google Scholar Link
Wilson E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

Author Biographies

John M. Zelenski is an associate professor of psychology at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada. He studies individual differences in happiness and the causes and consequences of social and environmentally sustainable behaviors.

Elizabeth K. Nisbet is an assistant professor in the Psychology Department at Trent University in Peterborough, Canada. Her research encompasses personality, social, health, and environmental psychology, exploring individual differences in “nature relatedness” and the links between human–nature relationships, happiness, and sustainable behavior.

 

Source

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013916512451901

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s